Overall score
Port Noarlunga
38.0/100
Seaford Meadows
42.6/100
Port Noarlunga for beach lifestyle and investment; Seaford Meadows for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Port Noarlunga
38.0/100
Seaford Meadows
42.6/100
Crime rate
Port Noarlunga
46.4 / 1k
Seaford Meadows
45.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Port Noarlunga
189
Seaford Meadows
180
Population
Port Noarlunga
3,245
Seaford Meadows
5,102
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Port Noarlunga | Seaford Meadows |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.0/100 | 42.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.7/100 | 61.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.4 / 1k | 45.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 19 |
| Walkability | 49.0/100 | 76.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 189 | 180 |
| Planning activity | 54 | 16 |
| Green cover | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Population | 3,245 | 5,102 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Port Noarlunga reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Seaford Meadows is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Port Noarlunga leans into coastal living, while Seaford Meadows feels more inland and suburban in character.
Port Noarlunga tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, while Seaford Meadows stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access. Port Noarlunga generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Seaford Meadows leans toward more sought-after housing.
Port Noarlunga suits people chasing a beach lifestyle more clearly, whereas Seaford Meadows is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.