Riverhills vs Wacol, QLD suburb comparison

Riverhills for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RiverhillsWacol

Overall score

Riverhills

47.5/100

Wacol

40.7/100

Crime rate

Riverhills

30.8 / 1k

Wacol

98.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Riverhills

45

Wacol

74

Population

Riverhills

4,121

Wacol

4,253

Metric leadRiverhills 3Wacol 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRiverhillsWacol
Overall score47.5/10040.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate30.8 / 1k98.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops921
Walkability15.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities4574
Population4,1214,253
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Riverhills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Wacol is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Riverhills sits among greener hillside streets, while Wacol keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Riverhills pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and overall desirability, whereas Wacol is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Riverhills generally means more sought-after housing, while Wacol leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Riverhills the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wacol.

Related comparisons