Rockingham vs Shoalwater, WA Suburb Comparison

Rockingham for retirees and families; Shoalwater for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RockinghamShoalwater

Overall score

Rockingham

49.3/100

Shoalwater

40.2/100

Crime rate

Rockingham

63.3 / 1k

Shoalwater

63.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rockingham

392

Shoalwater

118

Population

Rockingham

15,312

Shoalwater

4,368

Metric leadRockingham 9Shoalwater 12 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRockinghamShoalwater
Overall score49.3/10040.2/100
Housing (desirability)63.2/10057.8/100
Crime rate63.3 / 1k63.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools93
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves184
Public transport stops13828
Walkability100.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities392118
Green cover8.0%3.4%
Population15,3124,368
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Rockingham is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Shoalwater is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

Rockingham tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Shoalwater stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Rockingham the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Shoalwater.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Rockingham vs Shoalwater, WA Suburb… | Suburb Guide