Overall score
Roebourne
15.6/100
Wickham
27.8/100
Roebourne vs Wickham, WA suburb comparison
Roebourne for investment; Wickham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
RoebourneWickham
Crime rate
Roebourne
5315.5 / 1k
Wickham
2558.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Roebourne
0
Wickham
22
Population
Roebourne
975
Wickham
2,022
Metric leadRoebourne 2Wickham 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Roebourne reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Wickham is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Roebourne tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Wickham stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Investors may find Roebourne the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Wickham.