Overall score
Rokeby
45.0/100
Tranmere
48.3/100
Rokeby vs Tranmere, TAS Suburb Comparison
Rokeby for retirees and schools; Tranmere for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
RokebyTranmere
Crime rate
Rokeby
55.5 / 1k
Tranmere
55.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rokeby
119
Tranmere
45
Population
Rokeby
4,211
Tranmere
2,218
Metric leadRokeby 6Tranmere 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rokeby | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.0/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 69.0/100 | 61.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.5 / 1k | 55.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 23 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 119 | 45 |
| Green cover | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| Population | 4,211 | 2,218 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Rokeby is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Tranmere is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Rokeby sits among greener hillside streets, while Tranmere keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Rokeby is stronger for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability; Tranmere answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. Rokeby generally means more approachable housing costs, while Tranmere leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Rokeby if you are weighing families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Tranmere for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.