Overall score
Saddleworth
43.8/100
Stockport
36.3/100
Saddleworth for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Saddleworth
43.8/100
Stockport
36.3/100
Crime rate
Saddleworth
12.0 / 1k
Stockport
14.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Saddleworth
14
Stockport
1
Population
Saddleworth
483
Stockport
272
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Saddleworth | Stockport |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.8/100 | 36.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 67.3/100 | 52.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.0 / 1k | 14.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 28.8/100 | 28.8/100 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | — |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 14 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 6 |
| Green cover | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Population | 483 | 272 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Saddleworth is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Stockport is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Saddleworth is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Stockport answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Saddleworth suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Stockport is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.