Saddleworth vs Watervale, SA Suburb Comparison

Saddleworth for families and investment; Watervale for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SaddleworthWatervale

Overall score

Saddleworth

43.8/100

Watervale

52.2/100

Crime rate

Saddleworth

12.0 / 1k

Watervale

5.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Saddleworth

14

Watervale

11

Population

Saddleworth

483

Watervale

338

Metric leadSaddleworth 7Watervale 41 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySaddleworthWatervale
Overall score43.8/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)67.3/10042.5/100
Crime rate12.0 / 1k5.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)28.8/10028.8/100
Public transport stops42
Walkability6.0/1005.0/100
Nearby amenities1411
Planning activity210
Green cover0.7%4.2%
Population483338
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Saddleworth is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Watervale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Saddleworth is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access; Watervale answers with a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Saddleworth generally means more approachable housing costs, while Watervale leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Choose Saddleworth if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Watervale for retirees and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons