Armagh vs Watervale, SA Suburb Comparison

Watervale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArmaghWatervale

Overall score

Armagh

37.4/100

Watervale

52.2/100

Crime rate

Armagh

5.6 / 1k

Watervale

5.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Armagh

1

Watervale

11

Population

Armagh

351

Watervale

338

Metric leadArmagh 4Watervale 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArmaghWatervale
Overall score37.4/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)43.6/10042.5/100
Crime rate5.6 / 1k5.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)15.5/10028.8/100
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/1005.0/100
Nearby amenities111
Planning activity1010
Green cover0.0%4.2%
Population351338
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Armagh is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Watervale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Armagh sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Watervale is more regionally self-contained.

Armagh tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Watervale stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Watervale, while Armagh remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons