Overall score
Smiths Gully
57.2/100
St Andrews
48.6/100
Smiths Gully for retirees and families; St Andrews for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Smiths Gully
57.2/100
St Andrews
48.6/100
Crime rate
Smiths Gully
33.7 / 1k
St Andrews
64.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Smiths Gully
6
St Andrews
3
Population
Smiths Gully
356
St Andrews
1,186
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Smiths Gully | St Andrews |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.2/100 | 48.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.7 / 1k | 64.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 34 |
| Population | 356 | 1,186 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Smiths Gully is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while St Andrews is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
On the data, Smiths Gully is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; St Andrews answers with walkability and a larger local community.
Smiths Gully suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas St Andrews is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.