Overall score
Cottles Bridge
49.8/100
Smiths Gully
55.4/100
Cottles Bridge vs Smiths Gully, VIC Suburb Comparison
Smiths Gully for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Cottles BridgeSmiths Gully
Crime rate
Cottles Bridge
58.8 / 1k
Smiths Gully
67.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cottles Bridge
1
Smiths Gully
9
Population
Cottles Bridge
609
Smiths Gully
356
Metric leadCottles Bridge 4Smiths Gully 33 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesSmiths Gully
- Best for investmentSmiths Gully
- Best for best valueSmiths Gully
- Best for best schoolsSmiths Gully
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cottles Bridge | Smiths Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.8/100 | 55.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.4/100 | 54.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.8 / 1k | 67.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 11 |
| Green cover | 25.6% | 21.2% |
| Population | 609 | 356 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Cottles Bridge is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Smiths Gully is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Cottles Bridge tends to lead on a larger local community, while Smiths Gully stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Households prioritising schools may find Cottles Bridge the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Smiths Gully.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.