Cottles Bridge vs Hurstbridge, VIC Suburb Comparison

Cottles Bridge for schools; Hurstbridge for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cottles BridgeHurstbridge

Overall score

Cottles Bridge

49.8/100

Hurstbridge

64.5/100

Crime rate

Cottles Bridge

58.8 / 1k

Hurstbridge

18.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cottles Bridge

1

Hurstbridge

249

Population

Cottles Bridge

609

Hurstbridge

3,554

Metric leadCottles Bridge 3Hurstbridge 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCottles BridgeHurstbridge
Overall score49.8/10064.5/100
Housing (desirability)55.4/10056.4/100
Crime rate58.8 / 1k18.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—11
Public transport stops—12
Walkability0.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities1249
Planning activity1280
Green cover25.6%11.2%
Population6093,554
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Cottles Bridge reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Hurstbridge is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Cottles Bridge sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Hurstbridge is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Cottles Bridge is stronger for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Hurstbridge answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hurstbridge, while Cottles Bridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons