Cottles Bridge vs Hurstbridge, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Cottles Bridge | Hurstbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.7/100 | 61.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.6/100 | 60.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.4 / 1k | 22.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 11 |
| Public transport stops | — | 13 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 64.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 248 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 80 |
| Population | 609 | 3,554 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Cottles Bridge reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Hurstbridge is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Cottles Bridge sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Hurstbridge is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Cottles Bridge is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstbridge answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Neither suburb has a sharp audience split in the quick verdicts, though Hurstbridge rates good on overall desirability compared with Cottles Bridge.