Overall score
Cottles Bridge
49.8/100
Panton Hill
53.1/100
Cottles Bridge vs Panton Hill, VIC Suburb Comparison
Cottles Bridge for retirees; Panton Hill for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Cottles BridgePanton Hill
Crime rate
Cottles Bridge
58.8 / 1k
Panton Hill
89.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cottles Bridge
1
Panton Hill
27
Population
Cottles Bridge
609
Panton Hill
1,063
Metric leadCottles Bridge 4Panton Hill 43 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesCottles Bridge
- Best for familiesPanton Hill
- Best for best valuePanton Hill
- Best for best schoolsPanton Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cottles Bridge | Panton Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.8/100 | 53.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.4/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.8 / 1k | 89.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 12 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 27 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 34 |
| Green cover | 25.6% | 7.6% |
| Population | 609 | 1,063 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Cottles Bridge is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Panton Hill is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.
Cottles Bridge tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Panton Hill stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees and families may find Cottles Bridge the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Panton Hill.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.