Overall score
South Gladstone
38.5/100
Toolooa
37.0/100
South Gladstone vs Toolooa, QLD Suburb Comparison
South Gladstone for retirees and schools; Toolooa for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
South GladstoneToolooa
Crime rate
South Gladstone
85.4 / 1k
Toolooa
85.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
South Gladstone
47
Toolooa
10
Population
South Gladstone
3,476
Toolooa
992
Metric leadSouth Gladstone 7Toolooa 13 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesSouth Gladstone
- Best for investmentToolooa
- Best for best valueToolooa
- Best for best schoolsSouth Gladstone
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | South Gladstone | Toolooa |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 37.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.7/100 | 49.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 85.4 / 1k | 85.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 11.8/100 | 11.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 47 | 10 |
| Green cover | 18.7% | 49.0% |
| Population | 3,476 | 992 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
South Gladstone reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Toolooa is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
South Gladstone tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Toolooa stands out for housing affordability.
South Gladstone suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Toolooa is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.