Overall score
South Kempsey
35.5/100
Verges Creek
26.9/100
South Kempsey for families and schools; Verges Creek for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
South Kempsey
35.5/100
Verges Creek
26.9/100
Crime rate
South Kempsey
164.3 / 1k
Verges Creek
165.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
South Kempsey
0
Verges Creek
0
Population
South Kempsey
2,604
Verges Creek
298
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | South Kempsey | Verges Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.5/100 | 26.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 78.4/100 | 82.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 164.3 / 1k | 165.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 79 | 12 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 5 |
| Population | 2,604 | 298 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, South Kempsey is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, and Verges Creek is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
South Kempsey pulls ahead on parks and reserves and public transport access, whereas Verges Creek is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, South Kempsey sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Verges Creek.
Families and households prioritising schools may find South Kempsey the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Verges Creek.