Springdale Heights vs Wirlinga, NSW Suburb Comparison

Springdale Heights for retirees and families; Wirlinga for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Springdale HeightsWirlinga

Overall score

Springdale Heights

42.9/100

Wirlinga

38.1/100

Crime rate

Springdale Heights

94.9 / 1k

Wirlinga

138.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Springdale Heights

26

Wirlinga

1

Population

Springdale Heights

2,644

Wirlinga

395

Metric leadSpringdale Heights 9Wirlinga 11 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySpringdale HeightsWirlinga
Overall score42.9/10038.1/100
Housing (desirability)65.5/10053.3/100
Crime rate94.9 / 1k138.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops3517
Walkability57.0/10025.5/100
Nearby amenities261
Planning activity1524
Green cover27.4%0.1%
Population2,644395
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/109/10

Comparison summary

Springdale Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Wirlinga is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Springdale Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Wirlinga keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Springdale Heights pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Wirlinga is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Springdale Heights sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Wirlinga.

Springdale Heights suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Wirlinga is the stronger match for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons