Overall score
Stapylton
38.8/100
Yatala
42.1/100
Stapylton vs Yatala, QLD Suburb Comparison
Stapylton for retirees and schools; Yatala for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
StapyltonYatala
Crime rate
Stapylton
117.1 / 1k
Yatala
118.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Stapylton
7
Yatala
28
Population
Stapylton
430
Yatala
1,405
Metric leadStapylton 3Yatala 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Stapylton | Yatala |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.8/100 | 42.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.1/100 | 39.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 117.1 / 1k | 118.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 9 |
| Walkability | 8.0/100 | 17.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 28 |
| Green cover | 6.2% | 5.3% |
| Population | 430 | 1,405 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Stapylton reads as a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Yatala is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Stapylton tends to lead on relatively affordable housing, while Yatala stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. On housing, Stapylton sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Yatala.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Yatala, while Stapylton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.