Overall score
Stirling
55.5/100
Woodlands
53.9/100
Stirling vs Woodlands, WA Suburb Comparison
Stirling for retirees and investment; Woodlands for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
StirlingWoodlands
Crime rate
Stirling
50.2 / 1k
Woodlands
50.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Stirling
167
Woodlands
49
Population
Stirling
10,165
Woodlands
4,551
Metric leadStirling 8Woodlands 13 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Stirling | Woodlands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.5/100 | 53.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.0/100 | 47.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.2 / 1k | 50.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 60 | 18 |
| Walkability | 78.0/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 167 | 49 |
| Green cover | 12.5% | 10.3% |
| Population | 10,165 | 4,551 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Stirling is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Woodlands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Stirling is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Woodlands answers with schools and education options.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Stirling the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Woodlands.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.