Overall score
Stowport
43.8/100
Upper Burnie
52.5/100
Upper Burnie for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Stowport
43.8/100
Upper Burnie
52.5/100
Crime rate
Stowport
50.0 / 1k
Upper Burnie
50.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Stowport
3
Upper Burnie
73
Population
Stowport
446
Upper Burnie
1,891
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Stowport | Upper Burnie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.8/100 | 52.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.2/100 | 80.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.0 / 1k | 50.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 14 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 71.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 73 |
| Green cover | 29.4% | 9.2% |
| Population | 446 | 1,891 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Stowport is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Upper Burnie is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Stowport tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Upper Burnie stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability. On housing, Stowport sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Upper Burnie.
Stowport suits retirees more clearly, whereas Upper Burnie is the stronger match for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.