Sugarloaf vs Woodwark, QLD suburb comparison

Woodwark for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SugarloafWoodwark

Overall score

Sugarloaf

29.4/100

Woodwark

29.2/100

Crime rate

Sugarloaf

45.0 / 1k

Woodwark

79.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Sugarloaf

0

Woodwark

0

Population

Sugarloaf

310

Woodwark

559

Metric leadSugarloaf 2Woodwark 32 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySugarloafWoodwark
Overall score29.4/10029.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.1/10052.8/100
Crime rate45.0 / 1k79.8 / 1k
Parks & reserves1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population310559
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Sugarloaf is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Woodwark is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Woodwark leans into coastal living, while Sugarloaf feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Sugarloaf is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Woodwark answers with housing affordability and a larger local community.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Woodwark, while Sugarloaf remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Sugarloaf vs Woodwark, QLD suburb comparison | Suburb Guide