Table Top vs Thurgoona, NSW Suburb Comparison

Table Top for investment and schools; Thurgoona for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Table TopThurgoona

Overall score

Table Top

42.6/100

Thurgoona

45.4/100

Crime rate

Table Top

138.6 / 1k

Thurgoona

138.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Table Top

10

Thurgoona

128

Population

Table Top

1,516

Thurgoona

11,028

Metric leadTable Top 2Thurgoona 92 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryTable TopThurgoona
Overall score42.6/10045.4/100
Housing (desirability)50.9/10057.2/100
Crime rate138.6 / 1k138.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves35
Public transport stops172305
Walkability30.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities10128
Planning activity2297
Green cover3.2%8.5%
Population1,51611,028
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Table Top is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Thurgoona is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

On the data, Table Top is stronger for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Thurgoona answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Table Top sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Thurgoona.

On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Thurgoona, while Table Top remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons