Overall score
Torbay
25.4/100
Youngs Siding
21.2/100
Torbay vs Youngs Siding, WA suburb comparison
Torbay for beach lifestyle and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
TorbayYoungs Siding
Crime rate
Torbay
8889.7 / 1k
Youngs Siding
10699.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Torbay
0
Youngs Siding
0
Population
Torbay
378
Youngs Siding
314
Metric leadTorbay 5Youngs Siding 11 tiedacross 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Torbay | Youngs Siding |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 25.4/100 | 21.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.6/100 | 31.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 8889.7 / 1k | 10699.1 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 378 | 314 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Torbay reads as a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone; Youngs Siding is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Torbay leans into coastal living, while Youngs Siding feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Torbay is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Youngs Siding answers with walkability.
On balance, people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer Torbay, while Youngs Siding remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.