Overall score
Warrnambool
65.1/100
Woodford
48.4/100
Warrnambool for investment and schools; Woodford for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Warrnambool
65.1/100
Woodford
48.4/100
Crime rate
Warrnambool
106.2 / 1k
Woodford
10.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Warrnambool
114
Woodford
6
Population
Warrnambool
31,308
Woodford
436
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Warrnambool | Woodford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.1/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 77.7/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 106.2 / 1k | 10.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 25 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 170 | — |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 114 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 545 | 11 |
| Population | 31,308 | 436 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 9/10 |
Warrnambool is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Woodford is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Warrnambool tends to lead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, while Woodford stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Warrnambool generally means more mid-market housing value, while Woodford leans toward more sought-after housing.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Warrnambool the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Woodford.