Abercrombie vs Bathurst, NSW suburb comparison

Abercrombie for retirees and investment; Bathurst for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AbercrombieBathurst

Overall score

Abercrombie

47.5/100

Bathurst

68.0/100

Crime rate

Abercrombie

95.0 / 1k

Bathurst

94.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Abercrombie

21

Bathurst

584

Population

Abercrombie

1,127

Bathurst

7,001

Metric leadAbercrombie 3Bathurst 7across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAbercrombieBathurst
Overall score47.5/10068.0/100
Housing (desirability)88.3/10063.7/100
Crime rate95.0 / 1k94.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools9
Parks & reserves213
Public transport stops42250
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities21584
Planning activity1448
Population1,1277,001
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Abercrombie reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Bathurst is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Abercrombie pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Bathurst is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Abercrombie generally means more mid-market housing value, while Bathurst leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Abercrombie if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Bathurst for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons