Overall score
Bathurst
52.3/100
Dubbo
37.8/100
Bathurst vs Dubbo, NSW Suburb Comparison
Bathurst for retirees and families; Dubbo for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BathurstDubbo
Crime rate
Bathurst
94.6 / 1k
Dubbo
153.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bathurst
588
Dubbo
64
Population
Bathurst
7,001
Dubbo
43,516
Metric leadBathurst 9Dubbo 4across 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bathurst | Dubbo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.3/100 | 37.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.5/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.6 / 1k | 153.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 13.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 58 |
| Public transport stops | 250 | 1,884 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 588 | 64 |
| Planning activity | 57 | 413 |
| Green cover | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| Population | 7,001 | 43,516 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Bathurst reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Dubbo is a regional larger suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Bathurst pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability, whereas Dubbo is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Bathurst generally means more approachable housing costs, while Dubbo leans toward more sought-after housing.
Households prioritising schools may find Bathurst the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Dubbo.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.