Broken Hill vs Dubbo, NSW Suburb Comparison

Dubbo for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Broken HillDubbo

Overall score

Broken Hill

29.6/100

Dubbo

37.8/100

Crime rate

Broken Hill

161.0 / 1k

Dubbo

153.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Broken Hill

19

Dubbo

64

Population

Broken Hill

17,706

Dubbo

43,516

Metric leadBroken Hill 2Dubbo 11across 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBroken HillDubbo
Overall score29.6/10037.8/100
Housing (desirability)55.2/10057.6/100
Crime rate161.0 / 1k153.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools102
Weather (desirability)3.5/10013.4/100
Parks & reserves1958
Public transport stops1691,884
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities1964
Planning activity97413
Green cover0.0%2.1%
Population17,70643,516
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Broken Hill reads as a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Dubbo is a regional larger suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Broken Hill sits more remote from the capital, whereas Dubbo is more regionally self-contained.

Broken Hill tends to lead on schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook, while Dubbo stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. On housing, Broken Hill sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Dubbo.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Dubbo, while Broken Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons