Overall score
Dubbo
37.8/100
Gosnells
43.9/100
Dubbo vs Gosnells Suburb Comparison (NSW vs WA)
Dubbo for investment and value; Gosnells for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DubboGosnells
Crime rate
Dubbo
153.5 / 1k
Gosnells
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dubbo
64
Gosnells
791
Population
Dubbo
43,516
Gosnells
21,149
Metric leadDubbo 5Gosnells 7across 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dubbo | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.8/100 | 43.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.6/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 153.5 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 13.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 58 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 1,884 | 143 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 70.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 64 | 791 |
| Planning activity | 413 | — |
| Green cover | 2.1% | 10.3% |
| Population | 43,516 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Across states, Dubbo is a regional larger suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Dubbo sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Dubbo is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Gosnells answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability.
Choose Dubbo if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Gosnells for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.