Dubbo vs Werribee Suburb Comparison (NSW vs VIC)

Dubbo for investment and value; Werribee for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DubboWerribee

Overall score

Dubbo

37.8/100

Werribee

41.7/100

Crime rate

Dubbo

153.5 / 1k

Werribee

83.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dubbo

64

Werribee

265

Population

Dubbo

43,516

Werribee

50,027

Metric leadDubbo 3Werribee 10across 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDubboWerribee
Overall score37.8/10041.7/100
Housing (desirability)57.6/10042.9/100
Crime rate153.5 / 1k83.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools29
Weather (desirability)13.4/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves5863
Public transport stops1,884269
Walkability32.0/10077.0/100
Nearby amenities64265
Planning activity413243
Green cover2.1%9.2%
Population43,51650,027
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Dubbo (NSW) is a regional larger suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Werribee (VIC) is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Dubbo sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Werribee is in a middle-ring position.

Dubbo pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Werribee is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Dubbo generally means more sought-after housing, while Werribee leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Dubbo suits retirees more clearly, whereas Werribee is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons