Abercrombie vs Mount Rankin, NSW Suburb Comparison

Abercrombie for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AbercrombieMount Rankin

Overall score

Abercrombie

47.4/100

Mount Rankin

34.4/100

Crime rate

Abercrombie

95.0 / 1k

Mount Rankin

94.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Abercrombie

23

Mount Rankin

0

Population

Abercrombie

1,127

Mount Rankin

428

Metric leadAbercrombie 5Mount Rankin 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAbercrombieMount Rankin
Overall score47.4/10034.4/100
Housing (desirability)56.6/10037.2/100
Crime rate95.0 / 1k94.6 / 1k
Weather (desirability)52.2/10052.2/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops4242
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities230
Planning activity147
Green cover7.6%0.8%
Population1,127428
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Abercrombie reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Mount Rankin is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Rankin sits among greener hillside streets, while Abercrombie keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Abercrombie is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Mount Rankin answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Abercrombie generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Mount Rankin leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Abercrombie, while Mount Rankin remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons