Mount Rankin vs Windradyne, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Rankin for schools; Windradyne for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount RankinWindradyne

Overall score

Mount Rankin

34.4/100

Windradyne

43.3/100

Crime rate

Mount Rankin

94.6 / 1k

Windradyne

94.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Rankin

0

Windradyne

60

Population

Mount Rankin

428

Windradyne

3,309

Metric leadMount Rankin 2Windradyne 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount RankinWindradyne
Overall score34.4/10043.3/100
Housing (desirability)37.2/10065.8/100
Crime rate94.6 / 1k94.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)52.2/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—3
Public transport stops4274
Walkability30.0/10072.0/100
Nearby amenities060
Planning activity716
Green cover0.8%9.2%
Population4283,309
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/104/10

Comparison summary

Mount Rankin reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Windradyne is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Mount Rankin sits among greener hillside streets, while Windradyne keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Rankin is stronger for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Windradyne answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access. Mount Rankin generally means more sought-after housing, while Windradyne leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Retirees may find Mount Rankin the better fit, while families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Windradyne.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons