Overall score
Aberfeldie
62.4/100
Moonee Ponds
60.5/100
Aberfeldie vs Moonee Ponds, VIC Suburb Comparison
Aberfeldie for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AberfeldieMoonee Ponds
Crime rate
Aberfeldie
41.7 / 1k
Moonee Ponds
89.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aberfeldie
151
Moonee Ponds
621
Population
Aberfeldie
3,925
Moonee Ponds
16,224
Metric leadAberfeldie 5Moonee Ponds 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesAberfeldie
- Best for investmentAberfeldie
- Best for best valueAberfeldie
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aberfeldie | Moonee Ponds |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.4/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.6/100 | 50.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.7 / 1k | 89.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 96 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 151 | 621 |
| Planning activity | 45 | 216 |
| Green cover | 16.3% | 6.7% |
| Population | 3,925 | 16,224 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Aberfeldie is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Moonee Ponds is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Aberfeldie tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Moonee Ponds stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
Aberfeldie suits retirees more clearly, whereas Moonee Ponds is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.