Overall score
Aberfoyle Park
56.4/100
Chandlers Hill
32.0/100
Aberfoyle Park for retirees and families; Chandlers Hill for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aberfoyle Park
56.4/100
Chandlers Hill
32.0/100
Crime rate
Aberfoyle Park
21.0 / 1k
Chandlers Hill
9.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aberfoyle Park
317
Chandlers Hill
1
Population
Aberfoyle Park
11,234
Chandlers Hill
792
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aberfoyle Park | Chandlers Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.4/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.1/100 | 26.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.0 / 1k | 9.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 63 | 1 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 317 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 92 | 10 |
| Green cover | 8.9% | 0.5% |
| Population | 11,234 | 792 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Aberfoyle Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Chandlers Hill is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Aberfoyle Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Chandlers Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Aberfoyle Park the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Chandlers Hill.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.