Aberfoyle Park vs Chandlers Hill, SA Suburb Comparison

Aberfoyle Park for retirees and families; Chandlers Hill for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aberfoyle ParkChandlers Hill

Overall score

Aberfoyle Park

56.4/100

Chandlers Hill

32.0/100

Crime rate

Aberfoyle Park

21.0 / 1k

Chandlers Hill

9.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aberfoyle Park

317

Chandlers Hill

1

Population

Aberfoyle Park

11,234

Chandlers Hill

792

Metric leadAberfoyle Park 7Chandlers Hill 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAberfoyle ParkChandlers Hill
Overall score56.4/10032.0/100
Housing (desirability)64.1/10026.1/100
Crime rate21.0 / 1k9.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools5—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops631
Walkability100.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities3171
Planning activity9210
Green cover8.9%0.5%
Population11,234792
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Aberfoyle Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Chandlers Hill is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Aberfoyle Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Chandlers Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Aberfoyle Park the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Chandlers Hill.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons