Aberfoyle Park vs Coromandel Valley, SA suburb comparison

Aberfoyle Park for investment and value; Coromandel Valley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Aberfoyle ParkCoromandel Valley

Overall score

Aberfoyle Park

71.7/100

Coromandel Valley

59.5/100

Crime rate

Aberfoyle Park

21.0 / 1k

Coromandel Valley

6.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aberfoyle Park

316

Coromandel Valley

104

Population

Aberfoyle Park

11,234

Coromandel Valley

4,380

Metric leadAberfoyle Park 7Coromandel Valley 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAberfoyle ParkCoromandel Valley
Overall score71.7/10059.5/100
Housing (desirability)65.4/10050.9/100
Crime rate21.0 / 1k6.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Public transport stops6331
Walkability100.0/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities316104
Planning activity8131
Population11,2344,380
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Aberfoyle Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Coromandel Valley is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Aberfoyle Park tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Coromandel Valley stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Aberfoyle Park suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Coromandel Valley is the stronger match for retirees.

Related comparisons