Overall score
Aberfoyle Park
72.3/100
Coromandel East
35.6/100
Aberfoyle Park for investment and value; Coromandel East for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aberfoyle Park
72.3/100
Coromandel East
35.6/100
Crime rate
Aberfoyle Park
20.7 / 1k
Coromandel East
2.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aberfoyle Park
316
Coromandel East
1
Population
Aberfoyle Park
11,234
Coromandel East
345
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aberfoyle Park | Coromandel East |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.3/100 | 35.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.4/100 | 30.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.7 / 1k | 2.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Public transport stops | 63 | — |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 316 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 80 | 5 |
| Population | 11,234 | 345 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Aberfoyle Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Coromandel East is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.
Aberfoyle Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Coromandel East is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Aberfoyle Park suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Coromandel East is the stronger match for retirees and families.