Overall score
Acacia Ridge
45.4/100
Algester
55.4/100
Acacia Ridge for investment; Algester for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Acacia Ridge
45.4/100
Algester
55.4/100
Crime rate
Acacia Ridge
96.7 / 1k
Algester
28.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Acacia Ridge
214
Algester
103
Population
Acacia Ridge
7,486
Algester
9,020
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Ridge | Algester |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.4/100 | 55.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.3/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 96.7 / 1k | 28.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 31 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 214 | 103 |
| Green cover | 5.7% | 10.8% |
| Population | 7,486 | 9,020 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 5/10 |
Acacia Ridge is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Algester is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Acacia Ridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Algester keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Acacia Ridge pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Algester is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Acacia Ridge generally means more approachable housing costs, while Algester leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Algester, while Acacia Ridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.