Acacia Ridge vs Algester, QLD Suburb Comparison

Acacia Ridge for investment; Algester for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Acacia RidgeAlgester

Overall score

Acacia Ridge

45.4/100

Algester

55.4/100

Crime rate

Acacia Ridge

96.7 / 1k

Algester

28.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Acacia Ridge

214

Algester

103

Population

Acacia Ridge

7,486

Algester

9,020

Metric leadAcacia Ridge 3Algester 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAcacia RidgeAlgester
Overall score45.4/10055.4/100
Housing (desirability)47.3/10055.0/100
Crime rate96.7 / 1k28.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves89
Public transport stops4831
Walkability80.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities214103
Green cover5.7%10.8%
Population7,4869,020
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/105/10

Comparison summary

Acacia Ridge is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Algester is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Acacia Ridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Algester keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Acacia Ridge pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Algester is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Acacia Ridge generally means more approachable housing costs, while Algester leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Algester, while Acacia Ridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons