Acacia Ridge vs Coopers Plains, QLD Suburb Comparison

Acacia Ridge for retirees and investment; Coopers Plains for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Acacia RidgeCoopers Plains

Overall score

Acacia Ridge

45.4/100

Coopers Plains

50.1/100

Crime rate

Acacia Ridge

96.7 / 1k

Coopers Plains

153.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Acacia Ridge

214

Coopers Plains

177

Population

Acacia Ridge

7,486

Coopers Plains

5,675

Metric leadAcacia Ridge 5Coopers Plains 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAcacia RidgeCoopers Plains
Overall score45.4/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)47.3/10048.2/100
Crime rate96.7 / 1k153.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools510
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves88
Public transport stops4845
Walkability80.0/10069.0/100
Nearby amenities214177
Green cover5.7%7.2%
Population7,4865,675
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Acacia Ridge is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Coopers Plains is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Acacia Ridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Coopers Plains keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Acacia Ridge pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Coopers Plains is the better pick for schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Acacia Ridge sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Coopers Plains.

Acacia Ridge suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Coopers Plains is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons