Albion Park Rail vs Shellharbour City Centre, NSW Suburb Comparison

Albion Park Rail for value; Shellharbour City Centre for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Albion Park RailShellharbour City Centre

Overall score

Albion Park Rail

51.8/100

Shellharbour City Centre

50.1/100

Crime rate

Albion Park Rail

35.8 / 1k

Shellharbour City Centre

74.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Albion Park Rail

132

Shellharbour City Centre

81

Population

Albion Park Rail

6,920

Shellharbour City Centre

457

Metric leadAlbion Park Rail 7Shellharbour City Centre 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAlbion Park RailShellharbour City Centre
Overall score51.8/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)65.7/10071.3/100
Crime rate35.8 / 1k74.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools110
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves151
Public transport stops15622
Walkability86.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities13281
Planning activity372
Green cover6.7%6.7%
Population6,920457
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Albion Park Rail is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Shellharbour City Centre is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Albion Park Rail tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Shellharbour City Centre stands out for schools and education options, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Choose Albion Park Rail if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Shellharbour City Centre for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons