Overall score
Barrack Point
38.4/100
Shellharbour City Centre
50.1/100
Barrack Point for beach lifestyle and value; Shellharbour City Centre for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Barrack Point
38.4/100
Shellharbour City Centre
50.1/100
Crime rate
Barrack Point
80.8 / 1k
Shellharbour City Centre
74.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Barrack Point
44
Shellharbour City Centre
81
Population
Barrack Point
725
Shellharbour City Centre
457
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Barrack Point | Shellharbour City Centre |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.4/100 | 50.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.2/100 | 71.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 80.8 / 1k | 74.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 22 |
| Walkability | 22.5/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 44 | 81 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 2 |
| Green cover | 8.9% | 6.7% |
| Population | 725 | 457 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Barrack Point reads as a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Shellharbour City Centre is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Barrack Point leans into coastal living, while Shellharbour City Centre feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Barrack Point is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and a larger local community; Shellharbour City Centre answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.
Choose Barrack Point if you are weighing retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Shellharbour City Centre for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.