Barrack Point vs Mount Warrigal, NSW Suburb Comparison

Barrack Point for retirees and families; Mount Warrigal for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Barrack PointMount Warrigal

Overall score

Barrack Point

38.4/100

Mount Warrigal

40.7/100

Crime rate

Barrack Point

80.8 / 1k

Mount Warrigal

80.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Barrack Point

44

Mount Warrigal

84

Population

Barrack Point

725

Mount Warrigal

4,880

Metric leadBarrack Point 2Mount Warrigal 101 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBarrack PointMount Warrigal
Overall score38.4/10040.7/100
Housing (desirability)47.2/10062.5/100
Crime rate80.8 / 1k80.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves38
Public transport stops1576
Walkability22.5/10047.0/100
Nearby amenities4484
Planning activity312
Green cover8.9%11.3%
Population7254,880
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Barrack Point is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm, while Mount Warrigal is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Where Barrack Point is shaped by the coast, Mount Warrigal offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Barrack Point tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Mount Warrigal stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

Barrack Point suits retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mount Warrigal is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons