Flinders vs Mount Warrigal, NSW suburb comparison

Flinders for retirees and families; Mount Warrigal for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FlindersMount Warrigal

Overall score

Flinders

55.6/100

Mount Warrigal

46.6/100

Crime rate

Flinders

73.9 / 1k

Mount Warrigal

80.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Flinders

65

Mount Warrigal

83

Population

Flinders

7,118

Mount Warrigal

4,880

Metric leadFlinders 7Mount Warrigal 4across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFlindersMount Warrigal
Overall score55.6/10046.6/100
Housing (desirability)60.8/10071.3/100
Crime rate73.9 / 1k80.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Parks & reserves158
Public transport stops8076
Walkability45.0/10047.0/100
Nearby amenities6583
Planning activity1011
Population7,1184,880
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Flinders is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Mount Warrigal is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Warrigal sits among greener hillside streets, while Flinders keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Flinders pulls ahead on parks and reserves and public transport access, whereas Mount Warrigal is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Flinders sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Mount Warrigal.

Flinders suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Warrigal is the stronger match for investors.

Related comparisons

Flinders vs Mount Warrigal, NSW suburb… | Suburb Guide