Overall score
Flinders
55.6/100
Mount Warrigal
46.6/100
Flinders for retirees and families; Mount Warrigal for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Flinders
55.6/100
Mount Warrigal
46.6/100
Crime rate
Flinders
73.9 / 1k
Mount Warrigal
80.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Flinders
65
Mount Warrigal
83
Population
Flinders
7,118
Mount Warrigal
4,880
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Flinders | Mount Warrigal |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.6/100 | 46.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.8/100 | 71.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 73.9 / 1k | 80.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 80 | 76 |
| Walkability | 45.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 83 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 11 |
| Population | 7,118 | 4,880 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Flinders is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Mount Warrigal is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Warrigal sits among greener hillside streets, while Flinders keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Flinders pulls ahead on parks and reserves and public transport access, whereas Mount Warrigal is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Flinders sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Mount Warrigal.
Flinders suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Warrigal is the stronger match for investors.