Overall score
Mount Warrigal
46.6/100
Oak Flats
54.0/100
Mount Warrigal vs Oak Flats, NSW suburb comparison
Mount Warrigal for investment; Oak Flats for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount WarrigalOak Flats
Crime rate
Mount Warrigal
80.0 / 1k
Oak Flats
73.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Warrigal
83
Oak Flats
134
Population
Mount Warrigal
4,880
Oak Flats
6,840
Metric leadMount Warrigal 4Oak Flats 7across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesOak Flats
- Best for familiesOak Flats
- Best for investmentMount Warrigal
- Best for best schoolsOak Flats
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.6/100 | 54.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.3/100 | 60.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 80.0 / 1k | 73.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 76 | 97 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 83 | 134 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 30 |
| Population | 4,880 | 6,840 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Mount Warrigal is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Oak Flats is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mount Warrigal sits among greener hillside streets, while Oak Flats keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Warrigal pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Oak Flats is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.
Choose Mount Warrigal if you are weighing investors; lean toward Oak Flats for retirees and families.