Overall score
Mount Warrigal
40.7/100
Oak Flats
48.5/100
Mount Warrigal vs Oak Flats, NSW Suburb Comparison
Oak Flats for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount WarrigalOak Flats
Crime rate
Mount Warrigal
80.0 / 1k
Oak Flats
73.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Warrigal
84
Oak Flats
135
Population
Mount Warrigal
4,880
Oak Flats
6,840
Metric leadMount Warrigal 4Oak Flats 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.7/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.5/100 | 64.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 80.0 / 1k | 73.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 76 | 97 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 84 | 135 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 38 |
| Green cover | 11.3% | 8.7% |
| Population | 4,880 | 6,840 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Mount Warrigal is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Oak Flats is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mount Warrigal sits among greener hillside streets, while Oak Flats keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Warrigal pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability, whereas Oak Flats is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Choose Mount Warrigal if you are weighing investors; lean toward Oak Flats for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.