Overall score
Calderwood
46.0/100
Oak Flats
48.5/100
Calderwood for value and schools; Oak Flats for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Calderwood
46.0/100
Oak Flats
48.5/100
Crime rate
Calderwood
35.9 / 1k
Oak Flats
73.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Calderwood
3
Oak Flats
135
Population
Calderwood
3,013
Oak Flats
6,840
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Calderwood | Oak Flats |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.0/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.0/100 | 64.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 35.9 / 1k | 73.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 97 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 135 |
| Planning activity | 224 | 38 |
| Green cover | 0.9% | 8.7% |
| Population | 3,013 | 6,840 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Calderwood is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, while Oak Flats is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Calderwood sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Oak Flats is in a middle-ring position.
Calderwood pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Oak Flats is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
Choose Calderwood if you are weighing retirees, families, and investors; lean toward Oak Flats for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.