Overall score
Calderwood
45.1/100
Oak Flats
54.0/100
Calderwood for retirees and families; Oak Flats for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Calderwood
45.1/100
Oak Flats
54.0/100
Crime rate
Calderwood
35.9 / 1k
Oak Flats
73.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Calderwood
1
Oak Flats
134
Population
Calderwood
3,013
Oak Flats
6,840
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Calderwood | Oak Flats |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.1/100 | 54.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.9/100 | 60.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 35.9 / 1k | 73.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 97 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 134 |
| Planning activity | 186 | 30 |
| Population | 3,013 | 6,840 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Calderwood is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm, while Oak Flats is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Calderwood sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Oak Flats is in a middle-ring position.
Calderwood pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Oak Flats is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Calderwood generally means more sought-after housing, while Oak Flats leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Calderwood if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Oak Flats for households prioritising schools.