Overall score
Aldinga Beach
34.6/100
Sellicks Hill
32.1/100
Aldinga Beach for retirees and families; Sellicks Hill for beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aldinga Beach
34.6/100
Sellicks Hill
32.1/100
Crime rate
Aldinga Beach
26.0 / 1k
Sellicks Hill
32.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aldinga Beach
44
Sellicks Hill
8
Population
Aldinga Beach
10,667
Sellicks Hill
299
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aldinga Beach | Sellicks Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.6/100 | 32.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.7/100 | 44.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.0 / 1k | 32.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 62 | — |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 44 | 8 |
| Planning activity | 168 | 13 |
| Green cover | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Population | 10,667 | 299 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 7/10 |
Aldinga Beach reads as a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Sellicks Hill is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
On the data, Aldinga Beach is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Sellicks Hill answers with tree cover and green space, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Aldinga Beach generally means more sought-after housing, while Sellicks Hill leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Aldinga Beach, while Sellicks Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.