Sellicks Hill vs Willunga South, SA Suburb Comparison

Sellicks Hill for beach lifestyle; Willunga South for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Sellicks HillWillunga South

Overall score

Sellicks Hill

32.1/100

Willunga South

45.3/100

Crime rate

Sellicks Hill

32.2 / 1k

Willunga South

9.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Sellicks Hill

8

Willunga South

2

Population

Sellicks Hill

299

Willunga South

470

Metric leadSellicks Hill 3Willunga South 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySellicks HillWillunga South
Overall score32.1/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)44.9/10045.2/100
Crime rate32.2 / 1k9.8 / 1k
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Walkability2.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities82
Planning activity138
Green cover4.7%1.5%
Population299470
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Sellicks Hill reads as a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Willunga South is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Sellicks Hill leans into coastal living, while Willunga South feels more inland and suburban in character.

Sellicks Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Willunga South is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Sellicks Hill sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Willunga South.

People chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Sellicks Hill the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Willunga South.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons