Overall score
Allans Flat
47.8/100
Osbornes Flat
41.8/100
Allans Flat vs Osbornes Flat, VIC Suburb Comparison
Allans Flat for retirees and investment; Osbornes Flat for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Allans FlatOsbornes Flat
Crime rate
Allans Flat
9.6 / 1k
Osbornes Flat
10.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Allans Flat
2
Osbornes Flat
0
Population
Allans Flat
297
Osbornes Flat
285
Metric leadAllans Flat 6Osbornes Flat 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAllans Flat
- Best for familiesOsbornes Flat
- Best for investmentAllans Flat
- Best for best schoolsAllans Flat
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Allans Flat | Osbornes Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.8/100 | 41.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.2/100 | 33.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.6 / 1k | 10.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 8 |
| Green cover | 9.6% | 0.3% |
| Population | 297 | 285 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Allans Flat reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Osbornes Flat is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Allans Flat is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Osbornes Flat answers with housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Allans Flat suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Osbornes Flat is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.