Overall score
Allans Flat
47.8/100
Staghorn Flat
52.9/100
Allans Flat vs Staghorn Flat, VIC Suburb Comparison
Allans Flat for retirees and investment; Staghorn Flat for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Allans FlatStaghorn Flat
Crime rate
Allans Flat
9.6 / 1k
Staghorn Flat
7.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Allans Flat
2
Staghorn Flat
5
Population
Allans Flat
297
Staghorn Flat
368
Metric leadAllans Flat 1Staghorn Flat 73 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAllans Flat
- Best for familiesStaghorn Flat
- Best for investmentAllans Flat
- Best for best valueStaghorn Flat
- Best for best schoolsStaghorn Flat
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Allans Flat | Staghorn Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.8/100 | 52.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.2/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.6 / 1k | 7.7 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 9 |
| Green cover | 9.6% | 1.1% |
| Population | 297 | 368 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Allans Flat reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Staghorn Flat is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Allans Flat is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Staghorn Flat answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Allans Flat suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Staghorn Flat is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.