Overall score
Allans Flat
43.1/100
Staghorn Flat
36.5/100
Allans Flat for retirees and families; Staghorn Flat for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Allans Flat
43.1/100
Staghorn Flat
36.5/100
Crime rate
Allans Flat
6.4 / 1k
Staghorn Flat
7.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Allans Flat
0
Staghorn Flat
4
Population
Allans Flat
297
Staghorn Flat
368
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Allans Flat | Staghorn Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 36.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.3/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 6.4 / 1k | 7.7 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 4 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 9 |
| Population | 297 | 368 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Allans Flat reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Staghorn Flat is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Allans Flat is stronger for overall desirability; Staghorn Flat answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Allans Flat suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Staghorn Flat is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.