Overall score
Kiewa
37.5/100
Staghorn Flat
36.5/100
Kiewa vs Staghorn Flat, VIC suburb comparison
Kiewa for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KiewaStaghorn Flat
Crime rate
Kiewa
4.0 / 1k
Staghorn Flat
7.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kiewa
1
Staghorn Flat
4
Population
Kiewa
483
Staghorn Flat
368
Metric leadKiewa 6Staghorn Flat 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kiewa | Staghorn Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.5/100 | 36.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 4.0 / 1k | 7.7 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 4 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 9 |
| Population | 483 | 368 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Kiewa reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Staghorn Flat is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Kiewa tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Staghorn Flat stands out for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities. Kiewa generally means more mid-market housing value, while Staghorn Flat leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Kiewa, while Staghorn Flat remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.