Kiewa vs Staghorn Flat, VIC Suburb Comparison

Kiewa for retirees and investment; Staghorn Flat for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KiewaStaghorn Flat

Overall score

Kiewa

52.2/100

Staghorn Flat

52.9/100

Crime rate

Kiewa

5.9 / 1k

Staghorn Flat

7.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kiewa

1

Staghorn Flat

5

Population

Kiewa

483

Staghorn Flat

368

Metric leadKiewa 7Staghorn Flat 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKiewaStaghorn Flat
Overall score52.2/10052.9/100
Housing (desirability)51.5/10050.5/100
Crime rate5.9 / 1k7.7 / 1k
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops21
Walkability3.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities15
Planning activity59
Green cover43.5%1.1%
Population483368
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/109/10

Comparison summary

Kiewa reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Staghorn Flat is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Kiewa tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Staghorn Flat stands out for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage. Kiewa generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Staghorn Flat leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Kiewa, while Staghorn Flat remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons