Overall score
Altona North
47.6/100
Spotswood
58.7/100
Altona North vs Spotswood, VIC Suburb Comparison
Spotswood for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Altona NorthSpotswood
Crime rate
Altona North
99.6 / 1k
Spotswood
180.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Altona North
245
Spotswood
171
Population
Altona North
12,962
Spotswood
2,820
Metric leadAltona North 7Spotswood 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Altona North | Spotswood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.6/100 | 58.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.9/100 | 44.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 99.6 / 1k | 180.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 107 | 26 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 245 | 171 |
| Planning activity | 291 | 62 |
| Green cover | 3.6% | 7.7% |
| Population | 12,962 | 2,820 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Altona North reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Spotswood is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Altona North sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Spotswood is closer to the city centre.
Altona North pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Spotswood is the better pick for schools and education options, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Altona North suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Spotswood is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.