Overall score
Andrews Farm
51.3/100
Penfield
15.9/100
Andrews Farm for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Andrews Farm
51.3/100
Penfield
15.9/100
Crime rate
Andrews Farm
41.4 / 1k
Penfield
72.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Andrews Farm
54
Penfield
6
Population
Andrews Farm
8,699
Penfield
422
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Andrews Farm | Penfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.3/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 17.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.4 / 1k | 72.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 6 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 9.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 149 | 4 |
| Population | 8,699 | 422 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Andrews Farm reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Penfield is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Andrews Farm sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Penfield is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Andrews Farm is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Penfield answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Andrews Farm, while Penfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.