Andrews Farm vs Penfield, SA Suburb Comparison

Andrews Farm for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Andrews FarmPenfield

Overall score

Andrews Farm

26.8/100

Penfield

17.0/100

Crime rate

Andrews Farm

39.3 / 1k

Penfield

72.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Andrews Farm

60

Penfield

10

Population

Andrews Farm

8,699

Penfield

422

Metric leadAndrews Farm 7Penfield 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAndrews FarmPenfield
Overall score26.8/10017.0/100
Housing (desirability)52.0/10055.1/100
Crime rate39.3 / 1k72.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops236
Walkability57.0/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities6010
Planning activity1754
Green cover3.8%0.0%
Population8,699422
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Andrews Farm reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Penfield is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Andrews Farm sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Penfield is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Andrews Farm is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access; Penfield answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Andrews Farm sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Penfield.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Andrews Farm, while Penfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons