Overall score
Angaston
46.2/100
Eden Valley
45.9/100
Angaston for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Angaston
46.2/100
Eden Valley
45.9/100
Crime rate
Angaston
12.9 / 1k
Eden Valley
2.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Angaston
3
Eden Valley
1
Population
Angaston
2,202
Eden Valley
390
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Angaston | Eden Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.2/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.7/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.9 / 1k | 2.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 28.8/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 2 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 44 | 8 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 2,202 | 390 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Angaston is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Eden Valley is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Angaston is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability; Eden Valley answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Angaston generally means more mid-market housing value, while Eden Valley leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.
Choose Angaston if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Eden Valley for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.