Angaston vs Flaxman Valley, SA Suburb Comparison

Angaston for families and investment; Flaxman Valley for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AngastonFlaxman Valley

Overall score

Angaston

46.2/100

Flaxman Valley

45.9/100

Crime rate

Angaston

12.9 / 1k

Flaxman Valley

3.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Angaston

3

Flaxman Valley

3

Population

Angaston

2,202

Flaxman Valley

285

Metric leadAngaston 4Flaxman Valley 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAngastonFlaxman Valley
Overall score46.2/10045.9/100
Housing (desirability)61.7/10035.2/100
Crime rate12.9 / 1k3.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)28.8/10037.3/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops5—
Walkability7.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities33
Planning activity4413
Green cover0.0%4.3%
Population2,202285
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/109/10

Comparison summary

Angaston reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Flaxman Valley is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Angaston tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability, while Flaxman Valley stands out for a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook. Angaston generally means more mid-market housing value, while Flaxman Valley leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Angaston if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Flaxman Valley for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons