Overall score
Angaston
46.2/100
Flaxman Valley
45.9/100
Angaston for families and investment; Flaxman Valley for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Angaston
46.2/100
Flaxman Valley
45.9/100
Crime rate
Angaston
12.9 / 1k
Flaxman Valley
3.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Angaston
3
Flaxman Valley
3
Population
Angaston
2,202
Flaxman Valley
285
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Angaston | Flaxman Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.2/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.7/100 | 35.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.9 / 1k | 3.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 28.8/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 44 | 13 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Population | 2,202 | 285 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 9/10 |
Angaston reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Flaxman Valley is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Angaston tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability, while Flaxman Valley stands out for a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook. Angaston generally means more mid-market housing value, while Flaxman Valley leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Angaston if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Flaxman Valley for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.