Overall score
Angaston
41.0/100
Flaxman Valley
39.2/100
Angaston for investment and value; Flaxman Valley for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Angaston
41.0/100
Flaxman Valley
39.2/100
Crime rate
Angaston
18.0 / 1k
Flaxman Valley
9.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Angaston
0
Flaxman Valley
0
Population
Angaston
2,202
Flaxman Valley
285
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Angaston | Flaxman Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.0/100 | 39.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.9/100 | 36.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.0 / 1k | 9.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 37 | 8 |
| Population | 2,202 | 285 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 9/10 |
Angaston reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Flaxman Valley is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Angaston tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Flaxman Valley stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Angaston generally means more mid-market housing value, while Flaxman Valley leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Angaston if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Flaxman Valley for retirees and families.